|
| Valley
High School - Site Design |
The
Connections Committee was comprised of the following stakeholder
groups: 7 Valley High School students, 5 parents/community members,
13 Valley High School teachers, 1 Valley Southwoods administrator,
6 Teaching and Learning Services administrators, 1 Valley High
School support staff member. The meetings were chaired by
Vicky Poole, Valley High School Principal, and Donna Wilkin, Associate
Superintendent for Teaching and Learning Services. The scribe
was Phyllis Staplin, Director of Curriculum.
The committee met weekly from
September 17 through December 17. The meetings were scheduled
from 3:30 until 5:30 PM.
The committee was asked by Superintendent
Les Omotani to develop recommendations regarding how three smaller
learning communities could be structured and organized to provide
for all students increased personalization and the feeling of
being connected to the school for all students.
The committee began by reviewing
the work done by the Design Down Committee during the previous
year. It then developed a set of Grounding Statements that
established the criteria for the desired changes at the high school.
During the next three months the committee discussed and explored
numerous options for meeting the criteria for a more personalized
school environment. Minutes of each meeting, which detailed
the committee’s discussions and activities, were provided by the
scribe, Phyllis Staplin. The final recommendation was agreed
to by the committee at its last meeting.
1. Grounding
Statement
The
committee developed the following criteria, or Grounding Statements,
to use as a basis for its recommendations. Valley High School
by the design and organization of its smaller learning communities:
-
Will
enhance the connectiveness among all members of its learning
environment – students, staff, parents and the community
-
Will
encourage student voice
-
Will
promote greater flexibility in the development and delivery
of curriculum and the scheduling of courses
-
Will
provide a foundation for students to pursue a wide variety
of post-secondary opportunities
-
Will
address the needs of all learning styles in a population with
changing demographics
-
Will
incorporate ongoing technology improvements in all areas that
enhance teaching and learning
-
Will
provide opportunities for each student to demonstrate competencies
and intellectual growth in all courses
2.
Organization of the Three Learning Communities
The
Personal Adult Advocate program should be the organizing structure
for
the three smaller learning communities. Presently, every
Valley student is a member of a Personal Adult Advocate group
(PAA) with approximately fifteen students in each group.
There are 124 PAAs in the school and each group is facilitated
by a staff member. The primary purpose of the PAA is to build
relationships (student-to-teacher and student-to-student) and
promote better communication. Although concerns were expressed
about aspects of the current program, the committee believes
the PAAs should be the organizing structure for the smaller
learning communities. This will require clarification
of the aspects of the program that are working well and will
present opportunities for improvement.
The committee
recommends that the redesigned school be organized into three
groups with about forty-two PAAs in each group (about 600
students each). Each group of forty-two PAAs would share
the same administrator and guidance counselors. Each
group of forty-two PAAs also would work together on service
projects and share in social activities and possibly intramural
activities. Additionally, student government would be
redesigned to reflect the representation of the smaller learning
communities as well as the overall student body.
Advantages of Organizing
by PAA
Organizing
the three smaller learning communities around the Personal
Adult Advocate program will open new avenues for students
and staff to better know one another. The administrator
and counselors serving each smaller learning community will
have opportunities to interact more frequently with the staff
and students in their group through service projects, social
activities and student government activities as well as through
their time in the PAA groups. Students may feel more
connected to the school through the relationships built in
the smaller learning communities. And staff will have
new opportunities to develop and strengthen the PAA process.
Breadth
of Curriculum
Students
will continue to attend classes throughout the building and
continue to attend classes throughout the building with
diverse groups of students. The PAA structure will not limit
any student’s course options or their movement around the school.
This will allow the continuation of the wide variety of curricular
offerings while adding a unifying structure that increases personalization
and a feeling of being more closely connected to others in the
school.
3. Organization for Learning
It is recommended that the redesigned building add new types
of learning spaces to facilitate experiential learning. Project
rooms in which groups of students can work collaboratively and
creatively on hands-on assignments using appropriate technology
should be available for use by all classes. Seminar rooms for
large group instruction should be available as well.
It is
recommended that the school include a multi-media studio in
which students can learn video production techniques and high-end
graphics applications and where speech, debate and the performing
arts can utilize high tech multi-media equipment to enhance
learning. A combination town hall/courtroom space should
be available for teaching the skills of debate, dialogue and
group interaction. This room could also double as a
meeting room for faculty and the community. A black
box theatre (a room for small performances) is also recommended
as is a small health clinic in which students can learn more
about the health sciences.
An optional
interdisciplinary program in which a common group of students
is shared by 3 or four teachers during a blocked period of
time is also recommended. This “matrix” program would
offer another smaller learning community option for students.
Additionally, it is recommended that some groups of students
be able to work with the same teacher for multiple years as
they move through the various levels of courses. For
example, a mathematics teacher may work with the same group
of students during two or three years of mathematics classes,
once again creating a smaller learning community option.
New
social spaces that support student-to-student and student-to-teacher
interactions should be added, including a commons area where
students can converse or work together on extracurricular activities.
Traditional classrooms and labs for the sciences and vocational
programs should be included in the redesigned high school.
And meeting spaces for teachers (either offices or conference
rooms) should be included as well. A newly designed cafeteria
is also recommended as are new locker areas.
The specific location of classrooms, labs and studios should
be determined after additional discussion. One option discussed
by the committee is to co-locate departments in areas of the
building in which natural interdisciplinary connections exist.
For example, the language arts and social studies departments
could be located in a “humanities” area and the mathematics
and science departments could be placed near each other as well.
Another option is for individual courses to be located near
the experiential areas with which they would be most involved.
For example, speech classes, technology classes and graphics
arts classes could be located near the multi-media studio.
And government and debate classes could be located in close
proximity to the town hall/courtroom.
4. Daily Schedule
The committee discussed several possible ways to reorganize
the daily schedule. The purpose was to explore ways to deliver
instruction other than through the current eight-period modified
block schedule. A possible scenario that included three
options for schedules was presented by the Valley administration.
Because most of the discussion about scheduling occurred in
the final meetings of the Connections Committee, it was determined
that this topic should be further explored and some options
piloted by the school staff after the committee had concluded
its work.
5.
Need for a New Building on the Current Site
The Connections Committee believes a new Valley High School
is needed at the current site for the following reasons:
-
It will
provide a learning environment that better supports the
interests of all students
-
It will allow for new ways to deliver instruction
-
It will
support the learning styles of all students
-
It will
support relationships and provide for a stronger sense of
“connectedness” among students and staff
-
It will
enable better integration of technology into classroom instruction
-
It will
provide for a safer, healthier and more pleasurable learning
environment
-
It will
allow for lower operational and maintenance costs
-
It will
attract outstanding staff members
-
Staff will continue
to hold high expectations for student achievement
and maintain academic rigor in a meaningful and challenging
curriculum
The committee members believe that investing in a new Valley
High School today is an investment in the future of our community.
The committee strongly supports the recommendation found in
this document.
|
|